Expert fraud by failing to disclose solicitors at Woolfe & Co Solicitors provide specialist criminal defence for anyone accused of failing to disclose information under Section 3 of the Fraud Act 2006. Our experienced defence lawyers have a proven track record of protecting clients' rights from police investigation through to Crown Court trials. Available 24/7 for urgent legal advice.
Fraud by failing to disclose information is a serious criminal offence under the Fraud Act 2006. As specialist fraud by failing to disclose solicitors, we defend clients across the full spectrum of allegations, from failing to declare changes in circumstances for benefits to concealing material facts in complex commercial transactions.
The offence occurs when a person dishonestly fails to disclose information that they are under a legal duty to disclose, intending to make a gain for themselves or another, or to cause loss to another. Unlike fraud by false representation, this offence is committed by omission rather than by making a positive statement. What matters is the existence of a legal duty to disclose and the dishonest failure to fulfil that duty. Our criminal defence solicitors understand the complex legal duties that can arise in contractual, fiduciary, and statutory contexts.
Section 3 of the Fraud Act 2006 sets out key elements that the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt. If any one of these elements is not established, a conviction for fraud by failing to disclose cannot follow.
A Legal Duty to Disclose
The defendant must have been under a legal duty to disclose certain information. This duty can arise from statute, contract, fiduciary relationships, the custom of a particular trade, or from the nature of the transaction itself. The prosecution must identify and prove the precise legal duty that existed.
Dishonest Failure to Disclose
The defendant must have dishonestly failed to disclose the information. The test for dishonesty was clarified in Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] UKSC 67, which requires the court to assess both what the defendant knew and whether their conduct was dishonest by the standards of ordinary reasonable people.
Intention to Make a Gain or Cause Loss
The defendant must have intended, by failing to disclose the information, to make a gain for themselves or another, or to cause loss to another or expose another to a risk of loss. Gain and loss are defined broadly and include money, property, and other benefits.
Fraud by failing to disclose arises in many different circumstances. Below are some of the most common types of cases our fraud solicitors and lawyers handle.
Offence
Fraud by Failing to Disclose Information
Legislation
Section 3, Fraud Act 2006
Maximum Sentence
10 years imprisonment
Mode of Trial
Either way offence
Sentencing Guidelines
Fraud Sentencing Guideline (2014)
Understanding the potential penalties and available defences is essential. Our fraud by failing to disclose solicitors work strategically to achieve the best possible outcome, whether that means acquittal, reduced charges, or the most lenient sentence.
Fraud by failing to disclose is an either way offence, meaning it can be heard in the Magistrates Court or the Crown Court depending on the seriousness of the allegations. In the Crown Court, the maximum sentence is 10 years imprisonment.
Sentencing in fraud cases is governed by the Sentencing Council's Fraud Sentencing Guideline, which requires the court to assess culpability and harm. Higher culpability factors include an abuse of position of trust, targeting vulnerable victims, and sophisticated planning. Higher harm factors include significant financial loss, impact on victims, and offending carried out over a sustained period.
Key Sentencing Factor
The financial value involved is a critical factor in sentencing. Cases involving £100,000 or more fall into the highest harm category, while cases under £5,000 are generally treated less severely. However, even lower value cases can attract custodial sentences where there are significant aggravating features such as abuse of position or targeting of vulnerable victims.
Our fraud by failing to disclose lawyers work with forensic accountants and financial experts where necessary to challenge the prosecution's valuation of alleged loss, which can significantly affect the sentence bracket a case falls into.
A conviction for fraud by failing to disclose requires the prosecution to prove every element of the offence beyond reasonable doubt. Our criminal defence solicitors examine each element carefully to identify the strongest defence strategy.
No Legal Duty to Disclose
The prosecution cannot prove that the defendant was under any legal duty to disclose the information in question. Not every moral or ethical obligation to speak amounts to a legal duty.
Absence of Dishonesty
The defendant genuinely did not realise the information was material or did not know they were under a duty to disclose it. Honest belief, however mistaken, is a complete defence.
No Intention to Make a Gain or Cause Loss
Even if there was a failure to disclose, the defendant did not intend to make a gain or cause loss. The failure may have been the result of oversight, negligence, or administrative error rather than fraud.
Duress or Coercion
The defendant was forced or coerced into remaining silent by another person, negating the voluntariness required for criminal liability.
Evidential Challenges
Challenging the admissibility or reliability of the prosecution's evidence, including improper disclosure, unreliable witness testimony, or breach of PACE procedures.
Fraud investigations can be lengthy, intrusive, and deeply unsettling. Our fraud by failing to disclose solicitors are by your side from the very first contact through to trial or resolution.
| Stage | What Happens | How Our Fraud Solicitors Help |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Contact | Police or an investigative agency such as the DWP, HMRC, or the National Crime Agency may contact you, execute a search warrant, or invite you to attend a voluntary interview under caution. | We provide immediate legal advice before you answer any questions. Our solicitors attend every interview with you, whether at a police station or by arrangement. Police station representation is free under legal aid. |
| Evidence Gathering | Investigators gather financial records, bank statements, witness statements, digital evidence, and expert reports. This phase can last months or even years in complex fraud cases involving analysis of what should have been disclosed. | Our lawyers monitor the investigation, make representations to the police or the Crown Prosecution Service, and challenge disproportionate or unlawful evidence gathering including applications to challenge search warrants where appropriate. |
| Charge or Summons | If the CPS authorises charges, you will either be charged at the police station or receive a postal requisition requiring you to attend the Magistrates Court on a specified date. | We advise on the charge, explain the case against you, and begin preparing your defence immediately. Our fraud solicitors identify weaknesses in the prosecution case from the earliest stage. We discuss legal aid eligibility and funding options with you clearly and transparently. |
| First Court Hearing | The first hearing at the Magistrates Court, where the charges are read, a plea may be entered, and the court decides whether the case should stay in the Magistrates Court or be sent to the Crown Court. | We represent you at every hearing, make bail applications where appropriate, and ensure the court has all relevant information. If the case is serious enough for the Crown Court, we instruct the right criminal barrister for your case. |
| Trial Preparation | Disclosure of prosecution evidence, defence case statement preparation, expert instruction, and liaison with the court to set trial dates. Key focus on whether a legal duty existed and whether the failure was dishonest. | We analyse every document, identify disclosure failures, instruct forensic accountants and other experts, and build a comprehensive defence strategy. Our solicitors have extensive Crown Court trial experience in complex fraud cases. |
| Trial or Resolution | The case proceeds to trial at the Magistrates Court or Crown Court, or is resolved by way of a guilty plea with mitigation presented on your behalf. | We provide robust representation throughout. If a conviction follows, our solicitors present powerful mitigation to achieve the best possible sentence. Where appropriate, we also advise on Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) proceedings that may follow. |
Our fraud by failing to disclose solicitors address the most common concerns clients bring to us about Section 3 Fraud Act 2006 charges, the investigation process, and available defence strategies.
Fraud by false representation under Section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006 requires a positive act: making a statement that is untrue or misleading. Fraud by failing to disclose under Section 3 is committed by omission: staying silent when you are under a legal duty to speak. The critical distinction is that Section 3 requires the prosecution to prove a specific legal duty to disclose existed, something that is not required under Section 2. In our experience as fraud by failing to disclose solicitors, we regularly see both offences charged together where a case involves both positive misrepresentations and failures to reveal material information. For more on Section 2, see our fraud by false representation solicitors page.
A legal duty to disclose can arise from five main sources: (1) statute, such as the duty to notify the DWP of a change in circumstances when claiming benefits; (2) contract, particularly in insurance contracts governed by the principle of utmost good faith; (3) fiduciary relationships, including those between company directors and their company, or between solicitors and their clients; (4) the custom of a particular trade or market; and (5) the nature of the transaction itself, where silence makes what was said actively misleading. This is frequently the most contested element of a Section 3 prosecution. Our fraud by failing to disclose lawyers carefully scrutinise whether the prosecution can establish any legal duty at all. If no duty existed, there can be no conviction.
There is no statutory timeframe and the length of an investigation varies considerably. Straightforward cases, such as benefit fraud by failing to notify a change in circumstances, may be investigated and charged within three to six months. More complex cases involving business transactions, corporate structures, or international elements can take two to three years or longer. The police and prosecuting agencies are required to conduct investigations diligently and without undue delay. Our fraud by failing to disclose solicitors regularly make representations to expedite cases where there has been unreasonable delay, and we monitor limitation periods that may apply to certain regulatory offences.
Not necessarily. The court must apply the Sentencing Council's Fraud Sentencing Guideline, which assesses culpability and harm together with any aggravating or mitigating factors. First time offenders in lower culpability and lower harm categories may receive a community order or a suspended sentence. However, cases involving significant financial loss, abuse of a position of trust, or the targeting of vulnerable victims often attract immediate custody, even for first time offenders. Our fraud by failing to disclose lawyers prepare detailed mitigation bundles including character references, evidence of rehabilitation, and financial circumstances to present the strongest possible case for a non-custodial sentence. For an overview of how sentencing works across all fraud offences, visit our fraud and financial crime solicitors page.
Contact a specialist fraud solicitor immediately and do not answer any questions or provide any statement before receiving legal advice. Whether you are invited to a voluntary interview under caution or notified that you are the subject of an investigation, what you say at the earliest stage can have profound consequences for your defence. Our fraud by failing to disclose solicitors are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week on 01582 380938. Police station advice and representation is free under the legal aid scheme regardless of your financial circumstances. You can also contact us online at any time.
Yes. Under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), police officers can seize computers, mobile phones, tablets, financial documents, and any other material they reasonably believe constitutes evidence of an offence. This is typically carried out pursuant to a search warrant. Our fraud by failing to disclose solicitors regularly challenge the legality of search warrants and the scope of seizures where the police have acted beyond their powers. If material has been seized unlawfully, we can apply to the court for its return under Section 59 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. We also advise clients on their rights during searches, including the right to have a solicitor present.
Following a conviction for fraud by failing to disclose, the prosecution will almost always initiate Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) confiscation proceedings. The court will assess the benefit obtained from the criminal conduct and make a confiscation order requiring you to pay that amount. If you do not pay, a default prison sentence will be imposed, and the debt does not go away. POCA proceedings are separate from the criminal sentence and can be more financially devastating than the penalty itself. Our team has extensive experience challenging the prosecution's benefit figures, identifying legitimate assets that should be excluded from the calculation, and protecting our clients' financial interests. For specialist help, read about our Proceeds of Crime Act solicitors.
Legal aid is available for fraud cases subject to the interests of justice test and, for Crown Court cases, a means assessment. Police station representation is free for everyone regardless of financial means. For Magistrates Court cases, you will need to satisfy the means test unless you are in receipt of certain qualifying benefits. For Crown Court cases, legal aid is generally available, but you may be required to pay contributions towards your defence costs depending on your disposable income. If you are acquitted, any contributions you have made will be refunded with interest. Our free legal aid criminal defence solicitors team can assess your eligibility and guide you through the application process. Visit our fees and legal aid page for detailed information about funding options.
When facing fraud allegations, you need experienced criminal defence lawyers who will fight vigorously for the best possible outcome. Here is why clients across England and Wales trust Woolfe & Co Solicitors.
Our solicitors and lawyers focus exclusively on criminal defence, with significant experience in complex fraud cases including those involving legal duties of disclosure in contractual, fiduciary, and statutory contexts. We understand the technical, financial, and legal nuances that make the difference in fraud trials.
Fraud investigations often begin with an unexpected knock on the door. Our criminal defence lawyers are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to provide immediate legal advice and representation at police stations across England and Wales.
We do not just prepare for trial. Our fraud solicitors address every aspect of your case, from challenging whether a legal duty to disclose existed at all, to contesting search warrants and disclosure failures, and instructing forensic accountants and specialist criminal barristers for Crown Court trials.
With over 30 years of combined experience, our team has defended clients in fraud cases across England and Wales. Read our client reviews and case studies to see how we have helped people facing criminal allegations. Our fraud and financial crime solicitors also handle the full range of related charges, including fraud by false representation.
If you are being investigated or have been charged with fraud by failing to disclose, contact our specialist criminal defence solicitors now. Early legal advice can make a critical difference to the outcome of your case.
Fraud by failing to disclose often overlaps with other areas of criminal and regulatory law. Our specialist solicitors provide comprehensive defence across all related matters.
Specialist criminal defence for Section 2 Fraud Act 2006 charges, including benefit fraud, identity fraud, and investment fraud.
Specialist criminal defence lawyers for all fraud offences. Expert representation from police station to Crown Court, 24/7.
Overview of all fraud defence services, including money laundering, false representation, and fraud by abuse of position.
Expert fraud solicitors providing comprehensive criminal defence for all types of fraud allegations, from investigation to trial.
Specialist criminal defence for complex high value fraud cases prosecuted by the SFO and CPS Specialist Fraud Division.
Specialist white collar crime solicitors defending fraud, bribery, money laundering, insider dealing and all financial crime cases.
Specialist criminal defence solicitors for banking professionals facing fraud allegations, internal investigations and FCA referrals.
Specialist criminal defence solicitors for civil servants and public sector employees facing fraud allegations and internal investigations.
Specialist criminal defence lawyers for HMRC staff facing fraud allegations, internal disciplinary proceedings, and prosecution.
Specialist defence for tax fraud, VAT evasion, and HMRC criminal investigations under Code of Practice 8 and 9.
Expert defence against POCA confiscation proceedings, asset freezing, and civil recovery orders following fraud convictions.
Full criminal defence services covering all offence types across England and Wales, available 24/7.
Expert trial advocacy and defence for serious fraud cases heard in the Crown Court before a jury.
Discover what sets our criminal defence firm apart: 30+ years of experience, 24/7 availability, and a proven track record.